>
In-flight connectivity has dramatically improved over the past decade, with even a standard commercial flight now expected to offer Wi-Fi access. However, the speed and consistency of entry-level networking at 40,000 feet still leave a lot to be desired.
The market is already pricing in this demand: According to Grand View Research, the in-flight entertainment and connectivity (IFEC) sector is projected to exceed $11 billion by 2030. Two-thirds of this market is driven by connectivity-focused spending rather than entertainment.
This shift represents a high-speed revolution in airborne web access, moving away from legacy systems toward Low Earth Orbit (LEO) networks like Starlink. For decision-makers willing to invest in the upgrade, the promise of 500 Mbps download speeds transforms a private jet from a disconnected cabin into a fully functional, low-latency satellite office, Jettly, a private jet rental and fractional ownership service, reports.
Connection speed grabs headlines because execs understand its simplicity. However, there’s more to the story than the promise of 500Mbps speeds from LEO satellites, especially in comparison to traditional geostationary (GEO) equivalents.
As the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) points out in its most recent report on in-flight connectivity, business travelers expect in-flight connectivity to be the default, but are often confounded by the quality of the experience in practice. Latency is singled out as the primary stumbling block because, with GEO satellites orbiting at 25,000 miles, the round-trip time (RTT) of the network signal cannot meet the requirements of even a simple Zoom call.
For videoconferencing, optimal latency is 100ms, while 500ms is deemed acceptable. In-flight Wi-Fi using GEO satellites can range from 700ms to over 1000ms, depending on several factors. In other words, the cost of using this tech in a private jet cannot be justified by executive travelers who primarily want to stay productive by hosting remote meetings.
LEO satellites orbit at 1,200 miles at most, meaning the signal travels a much shorter distance and RTT shrinks significantly. Thus, achieving optimal latency for video conferencing is no longer a big ask. This performance leap is physically enabled by the transition to Electronically Steered Antennas (ESA), which use phased-array technology to track multiple satellites simultaneously, ensuring a seamless connection even during high-speed maneuvers.
The capital commitment for LEO connectivity has become more rigid this year. Starlink currently maintains an MSRP of $145,000 for its aviation hardware, but the real shift is in the subscription model. In early 2026, Starlink formalized strict speed-based tiers:
Rival provider Gogo Business Aviation has countered with its Gogo Galileo (LEO) network. Their "Unlimited + Streaming" plans currently start around $5,500 per month, though these often include caps on LEO data with unlimited air-to-ground (ATG) data as a backup.
Business executives must carefully weigh these costs when considering upgrading their fleet with high-speed Wi-Fi. Justifying the expense of installation and ongoing use is easier if business jets get used day in, day out, and on-the-move productivity for the people onboard cannot be compromised. Conversely, those who only need occasional superfast, low-latency network access in-flight might think twice.
The last point to make about the arrival of LEO satellite tech in private aviation and its ability to overhaul in-flight Wi-Fi is that it has at least one notable drawback before executives go all-in on adoption.
Because LEO networks are made up of lots of different satellites orbiting the Earth rapidly, rather than a smaller number of geostationary ones with a fixed relative position, planes connecting via the likes of Starlink will hand off between satellites frequently during travel. This introduces the potential for service dropouts or, at best, small spikes in latency, which may impede productivity, at least in short bursts.
To mitigate these risks, many 2026 flight departments are adopting multi-orbit redundancy, layering LEO speed over traditional GEO backups to protect high-stakes encryption tunnels.
Ultimately, execs must factor in the potential for disruption when planning to host important meetings while flying, where major deals are on the table. As with any operational choice, it’s a balancing act, and hopefully the data provided here will steer you down the right path.
Share this post:
Discover tips and trends in the industry.
5 minutes
min read
Trust in the Skies: Private vs. Commercial Pilots
A recent Jettly survey reveals that trust in commercial pilots has declined, partly due to incidents like the Alaska Airlines event, with Delta, American, and United emerging as the most trusted airlines. Factors reducing trust include visible fatigue, late arrivals, and poor communication. While Gen Z shows a higher trust in private pilots, cost remains the biggest barrier to private flying, alongside concerns about accessibility and environmental impact. Justin Crabbe, CEO of Jettly, emphasizes that expanding networks, improved booking platforms, and new options like jet cards and fractional ownership are making private aviation more accessible and eco-conscious.
Read More5 minutes
min read
Fractional Private Jet Ownership: The Good, The Bad, The Ugly
Private jet charters offer affordability, flexibility, and convenience compared to fractional jet ownership. Charters are cost-effective for one-time trips without the high expenses of fractional ownership. They also provide more control over travel plans, including choice of airports and aircraft, whereas fractional ownership may involve limitations and advance booking requirements. Lastly, private jet charters handle all travel arrangements, enhancing overall convenience.
Read MoreStay updated with our latest insights and tips to elevate your journey with us.
MEMBERSHIPS AND ASSOCIATIONS